Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)

[Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis]

2012-05-14 06:58:30 Duncan napisał(a):
> Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote:
> >
> >> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use
> >> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make.
> >
> > You are right, of course.
>
> > I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then:
> >
> >    eclass/bsdmk.eclass
> >    eclass/python.eclass
> >    eclass/scons-utils.eclass
> >    dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild
> >    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild
> >    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild
> >    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild
> >    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild
> >    dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild
> >    gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild
> >    net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild
> >    sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild
> >    sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild
>
> Ouch, in eclasses too!

All matches in eclasses and some matches in ebuilds are false positives.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis