Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo Development <gentoo-dev@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 14:07:21
Message-Id: 201205141605.26265.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposal of accepting arguments to `default` in src_install (and more?) phases in EAPI=5 (for the next council meeting?) by Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
2012-05-14 06:58:30 Duncan napisał(a):
> Ulrich Mueller posted on Sat, 12 May 2012 20:39:05 +0200 as excerpted: > > > On Sat, 12 May 2012, Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> EXTRA_EMAKE isn't supposed to be mentioned there. It's an internal use > >> variable for users who need to pass something specific to make. > > > > You are right, of course. > > > I guess the following ebuilds should be fixed then: > > > > eclass/bsdmk.eclass > > eclass/python.eclass > > eclass/scons-utils.eclass > > dev-db/redis/redis-2.2.12.ebuild > > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.4-r1.ebuild > > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.7.ebuild > > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.8.ebuild > > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.10.ebuild > > dev-db/redis/redis-2.4.13.ebuild > > gnome-base/gconf/gconf-2.32.4.ebuild > > net-misc/mico/mico-2.3.13-r5.ebuild > > sci-chemistry/ccp4-apps/ccp4-apps-6.1.3-r10.ebuild > > sys-fs/udev/udev-171-r5.ebuild > > Ouch, in eclasses too!
All matches in eclasses and some matches in ebuilds are false positives. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis