Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Weber <xmw@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:36:15
Message-Id: 4FBD49F3.9080308@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver by Justin
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA256
3
4 On 05/23/2012 06:58 PM, Justin wrote:
5 > Was this a vote for or against a quick proceeding towards git?
6 No, just to decide if git-cvsserver (providing cvs access) should be
7 part of an "git master tree" szenario.
8
9 In bugzie: Should https://bugs.gentoo.org/333699 stay a blocker of
10 https://bugs.gentoo.org/333531.
11
12 No flame about "git over cvs" in general, whether or not sparse
13 checkouts (i.e. w/o kde-*,gnome-* categories) make sense.
14
15 Michael
16 - --
17 Gentoo Dev
18 http://xmw.de/
19 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
20 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
21 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
22
23 iF4EAREIAAYFAk+9SfMACgkQknrdDGLu8JCGtQEAiS3Wcsll94w2rqlMP2WpSypU
24 fLdxa2wjstJ5Y/2iXCcA+wX/p+OwBzjLAxiwKnSl98XlLSIT/Qsxm5H1TvEEJ71w
25 =k8j9
26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----