From: | "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | ||
Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2011 15:10:10 | ||
Message-Id: | 4E96FF2F.8090705@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild by Samuli Suominen |
1 | Samuli Suominen schrieb: |
2 | > you're right. sorry. that came out too harsh. lets rephrase this as: |
3 | |
4 | No offense taken :) |
5 | |
6 | > "This /topic should be in the end-quiz, and mentioned in the mentoring |
7 | > guide to cover basis as part of the KEYWORDS visibility handling." |
8 | |
9 | This is something that I have been asking for all the time. If you think |
10 | that what qutecom did should be illegal in Gentoo, then disallow it in |
11 | policy or code. |
12 | |
13 | |
14 | Best regards, |
15 | Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> |