| 1 |
Tiziano Müller wrote: |
| 2 |
> Let's go for censorship! Let's vote for gagging those users who don't |
| 3 |
> have any idea of development and those ex-devs who think they still have |
| 4 |
> anything to say. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Yawn... |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> And to give that comment a technical side: |
| 10 |
> - Do you think that any dev will regularly check for messages written by |
| 11 |
> users he barely knows and give his ok? Risking being moderated himself |
| 12 |
> if somebody else with magic foo thinks that the post was inappropriate? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
given I don't have much time I cannot tell if I'll be really able but I |
| 15 |
have _no_ problems in modding up emails. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> - Who decides/defines when a post is a bad post? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
the same people that did before? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> - What if one dev thinks a post is inappropriate and rejects it, can |
| 22 |
> another dev still let it through? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
why? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> - Why not just make -core o+r if you think that it gets leaked out |
| 27 |
> anyway and leave -dev as it is? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
core is good as is. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
> - When do we start with the moderation of -project? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-project, project's rules... |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
lu - I don't give a damn |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Luca Barbato |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 43 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives