| 1 |
On Aug 3, 2013 10:06 AM, "Donnie Berkholz" <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 15:36 Fri 02 Aug , William Hubbs wrote: |
| 4 |
> > All, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > This message is an announcement and a reminder. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > OpenRc-0.12 will be introduced to the portage tree in the next few days. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > If you are using ~arch OpenRc, the standard disclaimer applies: remember |
| 11 |
> > that you might be subject to breakage. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > I do not know of any breakage personally. It does work on my system, and |
| 14 |
> > I know of others who are using OpenRc from git successfully. Some are |
| 15 |
> > OpenRc team members, and at least one is a Gentoo user. |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > If you are not comfortable with the possibility of breakage, I recommend |
| 18 |
> > that you make sure you do not upgrade right away. |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > If, on the other hand, you are comfortable with that possibility and you |
| 21 |
> > are willing to help us test and get rid of bugs before we go stable, |
| 22 |
> > feel free to run ~arch. |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> > In other words, this is the standard Gentoo disclaimer, so consider |
| 25 |
> > yourself warned. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Man, in terms of how to phrase things, this is way wrong. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> If you're comfortable with your stuff breaking really? No. If you want |
| 30 |
> to help improve Gentoo. |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> -- |
| 33 |
> Thanks, |
| 34 |
> Donnie |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> Donnie Berkholz |
| 37 |
> Council Member / Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux <http://dberkholz.com> |
| 38 |
> Analyst, RedMonk <http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/> |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
I am not comfortable with this either. If you think the new openrc will |
| 41 |
likely break things please mask it for a few days. Do not expect all users |
| 42 |
to read the mailing list. |
Archives