| 1 |
On Monday 08 November 2004 01:42, Aron Griffis wrote: |
| 2 |
> This information is already available and parseable... Proof of concept: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> http://gentoo.org/~agriffis/ekwlog |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> It isn't perfect for a number of reasons, including speed and the need |
| 7 |
> for ebuilds to be present in your portage tree. But both of these |
| 8 |
> problems could be overcome. This is just a demonstration that the |
| 9 |
> information is available already in the cvs history. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Nice. I liked the approach. If it could run on the entire tree, and generate a |
| 12 |
history "cache", that would just do it. |
| 13 |
Do you think using cvs access instead of web-access (viewcvs) would speed up |
| 14 |
the process? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Eldad Zack <eldad@g.o> |
| 19 |
Key/Fingerprint at pgp.mit.edu, ID 0x96EA0A93 |
Archives