| 1 |
* Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> [080912 17:38]: |
| 2 |
> How much research did you do before sending your email? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Obviously not enough. (sry for that) |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> Did you read "EAPI and PMS for people who haven't been paying attention"? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
No I didn't until now and thx for the hint. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
But for me it's still questionable why we don't have a gentoo project |
| 11 |
for this important task? (a git summary page is not a project page |
| 12 |
IMHO). If someone wants to drop in into the task it's not easy as |
| 13 |
information is scattered (IMHO). What are GLEPs for if not for gentoo |
| 14 |
enhancements like a PMS draft and the fixation of location, type, |
| 15 |
maintainer, modification interface of that document? I even would go |
| 16 |
further and would say there should be a procedure for maintaining and |
| 17 |
approval of the document and changes on them. (a bit more formal then |
| 18 |
a mail with "could the council please discuss 'it'" somewhere in the |
| 19 |
depth of a discussion thread) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
cite form the mail: |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
"So far as I'm aware, everyone who's currently working on PMS is |
| 24 |
working off this repository:" |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
That's not a formulation I would choose for an approved repository |
| 27 |
location or am I missing a council decission? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Once again sry for the inconvenience caused, greets |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
mueli |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
------------------------------------------------------------ |
| 36 |
Michael Hammer | <mueli@g.o> | Graz, AT |
| 37 |
Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at |
Archives