| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Well, only Robin can explain exactly what he meant, but it sounds like |
| 3 |
> we don't want the committer field to ever have a non-gentoo email in |
| 4 |
> it, and signatures should be gentoo as well. So, if a dev just |
| 5 |
> applies a patch to their tree/etc then there is no issue (just set |
| 6 |
> author). If a dev wants to actually pull in a commit they'd need to |
| 7 |
> edit the fields accordingly and re-sign it. Not sure offhand how to |
| 8 |
> best do that (I assume it is possible - probably with some variation |
| 9 |
> on rebase or something rebase calls). |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Well, it doesn't seem like a big deal IF there's an explicit merge |
| 12 |
commit that's signed by a dev. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Cheers, |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Dirkjan |
Archives