Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 12:46:58
Message-Id: CAKmKYaA=KoyvXRxpg+9uYiha_2vgPg7Z4+kywmC_8XTvb48-mA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing by Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
> Well, only Robin can explain exactly what he meant, but it sounds like > we don't want the committer field to ever have a non-gentoo email in > it, and signatures should be gentoo as well.  So, if a dev just > applies a patch to their tree/etc then there is no issue (just set > author).  If a dev wants to actually pull in a commit they'd need to > edit the fields accordingly and re-sign it.  Not sure offhand how to > best do that (I assume it is possible - probably with some variation > on rebase or something rebase calls).
Well, it doesn't seem like a big deal IF there's an explicit merge commit that's signed by a dev. Cheers, Dirkjan

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Git braindump: 1 of N: merging & git signing Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>