Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Magnus Granberg <zorry@×××.nu>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 03:16:18
Message-Id: 200901110512.11212.zorry@ume.nu
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc 4.3.2 security updates by Ciaran McCreesh
1 On Sunday 11 January 2009 01.06.45 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:03:17 -0600
3 >
4 > Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o> wrote:
5 > > I'm really hoping this isn't a stable candidate. :P
6 >
7 > Is an earlier gcc 4.3 a stable candidate, or have those plans been
8 > abandoned?
9 >
10 > (I'm wondering whether it's worth the pain of dealing with 4.1's lack
11 > of tr1 regex support...)
12
13 We will get more bugs if we enable FORTIFY_SOURCE for the stable canididet of
14 gcc 4.3 like /usr/include/bits/fcntl2.h:51: error: call
15 to '__open_missing_mode' declared with attribute error: open with O_CREAT in
16 second argument needs 3 arguments
17 GLIBC won't even compile with it.
18 /Zorry