| 1 |
On Friday 15 April 2005 22:18, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 22:14:59 +0900 Jason Stubbs <jstubbs@g.o> |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> | If this actually scared anybody (that received it), my apologies. I |
| 6 |
> | was confused about bugs. Fixing the flat profiles will be problem |
| 7 |
^not^a^ |
| 8 |
> | either. The bug is that 2.0.50 will die if two profiles in a cascade |
| 9 |
> | define the same variable. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Which should be fine, because no-one is even going to *think* about |
| 12 |
> wanting sub-profile-specific USE_EXPAND. Right? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
USE_EXPAND is not an incremental. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
The only other settings that directly relate to ebuilds and currently live in |
| 17 |
make.globals are CONFIG_PROTECT and CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK. These should also be |
| 18 |
moved into the tree. Any objections? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives