1 |
Le vendredi 02 juillet 2010 à 08:51 +0300, Samuli Suominen a écrit : |
2 |
> I've recently stumbled upon several packages unnecessarily using old |
3 |
> preserve_old_lib feature from eutils.eclass, namely: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> libgnomekbd |
6 |
> libproxy |
7 |
> |
8 |
> And then users hit issues like this: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326517#c5 |
11 |
|
12 |
1. How is it different than preserved-libs feature from |
13 |
portage-2.2 ? The issue that I have with you argument is that |
14 |
you encourage breaking user apps at build time instead of |
15 |
leaving the user some time to run revdep-rebuild or any other |
16 |
tool needed when user wishes so. |
17 |
2. We cannot (and do not in gnome herd) support users who did not |
18 |
complete revdep-rebuild. We help them get out of build problem |
19 |
if possible and if the bug still exists by then, we try to fix |
20 |
it but otherwise it's just closed invalid. |
21 |
|
22 |
-- |
23 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
24 |
Gentoo |