| 1 |
On 09/30/2013 07:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: |
| 2 |
> hasufell schrieb: |
| 3 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=464536 |
| 4 |
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=470554 |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> for the first bug: |
| 7 |
>> net-libs/ortp media-libs/mediastreamer and net-voip/linphone |
| 8 |
>> are from the same upstream and actually have to be bumped and |
| 9 |
>> stabilized TOGETHER, because it is very likely that they break |
| 10 |
>> otherwise. And that's exactly what happened. The maintainer was |
| 11 |
>> probably aware of it, but didn't respond, so arch testers went ahead |
| 12 |
>> and did not test reverse deps. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> I already replied in the second bug but let me reiterate again. What I |
| 15 |
> wrote in October 2012 to this list[1] is basically still true. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Following retirements, there is nobody in voip team who is interested in |
| 18 |
> these packages any more. Nobody in voip requested that these packages go |
| 19 |
> stable. When I read bugzilla reports that version bumps (typically done |
| 20 |
> as drive-by commits by outside developers) break consumers, then I |
| 21 |
> sometimes update the dependencies to account for that. When I saw the |
| 22 |
> second stabilization bug, I added the blocker, but the stabilization |
| 23 |
> proceeded anyway due to technical issues with the robo-stable scripts. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> due to technical issues with the robo-stable scripts. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> due to technical issues with the robo-stable scripts. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
let me summarize my response as "WAT" |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
Maybe we should just have a cronjob that just does all that automatically? |
Archives