| 1 |
On 10/20/2012 4:07 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/20/2012 03:51 PM, Gregory M. Turner wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Anyhow, given that eclasses can probably avoid auto-die() if they need |
| 4 |
>> to, this leaves the issue of nonfatal allowing die to return to |
| 5 |
>> callers... is there really any reason that die() needs to work this way? |
| 6 |
>> If helpers always used __helpers_die() instead of die(), then couldn't |
| 7 |
>> die() be changed to ignore PORTAGE_NONFATAL? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Yes. It's a bug, as Ciaran said. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
For anyone following this discussion, just a note that I've created a |
| 12 |
bug for this issue: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439356 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
A proposed patch is attached to the bug. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-gmt |
Archives