| 1 |
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 21:23:49 +0100 |
| 2 |
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Now we're re-joining policy and practice. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
By forcing use of dev.gentoo.org for self-hosted SRC_URI files? |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > What legitimate use does mirror://gentoo retain when we do have a |
| 9 |
> > solution? Ultimate patch attached. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> Yes and? We're going to have a distinct mirror://gentoo-projects/ |
| 12 |
> (just to be on the safe side for overlays mainly) to fetch the |
| 13 |
> distfiles for the custom packages. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
By forcing use of mirror://gentoo-projects for self-hosted SRC_URI |
| 16 |
files? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'm lost now. Do you/infra/$GENTOO_DEITY plan to first force everyone to |
| 19 |
use dev.g.o and then move to mirror://gentoo-projects soon after? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Why don't we just change the meaning of mirror://gentoo and be done |
| 22 |
with it, without the interim being extended? We could even have the |
| 23 |
mirror sync scripts interpret mirror://gentoo in a new way. All we then |
| 24 |
need to do on the QA side is to somehow enforce the way mirror://gentoo |
| 25 |
is used. :) |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
jer |
Archives