Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:04:27
Message-Id: 1339743815.8254.1.camel@belkin4
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead by Mike Frysinger
El mar, 12-06-2012 a las 23:02 -0400, Mike Frysinger escribió:
> i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup of variables into > pkg_setup that only matter to src_* funcs presumably so they don't have to > call the respective src_* func from an inherited eclass. unfortunately this > adds pointless overhead to binpkgs. can we please move away from this > practice ? > > i've seen this with a good number of the GNOME packages like: > pkg_setup() { > G2CONF="${G2CONF} > --disable-bash-completion > --disable-hal > --disable-schemas-compile > --with-dbus-service-dir=/usr/share/dbus-1/services > $(use_enable afp) > $(use_enable archive) > $(use_enable avahi) > $(use_enable bluetooth obexftp) > $(use_enable bluray) > $(use_enable cdda) > $(use_enable fuse) > $(use_enable gdu) > $(use_enable gphoto2) > $(use_enable ios afc) > $(use_enable udev) > $(use_enable udev gudev) > $(use_enable http) > $(use_enable gnome-keyring keyring) > $(use_enable samba)" > } > > ugh > -mike
Will CC the rest of gnome team because I thought this way of passing configure options were intentional for some reason (or, at least, I remember being using it for a looong time)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuild laziness and binpkg overhead Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o>