| 1 |
Brad House wrote: [Wed Dec 10 2003, 09:00:12PM EST] |
| 2 |
> So before you do this throughout, you must study the patch |
| 3 |
> and make sure there is no way it can adversely affect |
| 4 |
> other arches. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Right, that was the point of: |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > 2. We shouldn't be applying patches that are only "safe" for one |
| 9 |
> > architecture. If possible (and I know this is a little more |
| 10 |
> > work), we should be writing patches that correct the problem |
| 11 |
> > without hurting other arches. This practice would give us an |
| 12 |
> > easier time pushing patches upstream. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Aron Griffis |
| 16 |
Gentoo Linux Developer (alpha / ia64 / ruby / vim) |
| 17 |
Key fingerprint = E3B6 8734 C2D6 B5E5 AE76 FB3A 26B1 C5E3 2010 4EB0 |
Archives