| 1 |
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:08:55PM -0400, Stephen P. Becker wrote: |
| 2 |
> Starting a new thread here for a new angle... |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> As Stuart mentioned, bugs for any ebuild on o.g.o would go through |
| 5 |
> Gentoo bugzilla. It seems like genstef and jokey have completely |
| 6 |
> ignored support from arch teams for this overlay. What are you |
| 7 |
> proposing with respect to arch keywords and package.mask? Do you |
| 8 |
> actually expect us to do anything but close assigned bugs for sunrice |
| 9 |
> ebuilds as WONTFIX? Where else would these bugs go except for arch |
| 10 |
> teams, seeing as we clearly can't assign them to end users who |
| 11 |
> originally submitted the maintainer-wanted ebuilds? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And while we're talking collateral damage, could the Sunrise folks |
| 15 |
please make sure it's abundantly clear that users shouldn't ask for |
| 16 |
support in #gentoo after installing any Sunrise ebuilds? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Thanks, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Jon Portnoy |
| 21 |
avenj/irc.freenode.net |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives