| 1 |
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I like the idea of appointed leads instead of holding elections, it |
| 4 |
> fits into my big picture of less bureaucracy and more meritocracy |
| 5 |
> (see my email re running for council on -project). Appointments |
| 6 |
> would be made by the "next level up" from the lead. So project leads |
| 7 |
> would come from the council, subproject leads from the project, etc. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
What problem are you trying to solve? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
There maybe some point doing this for projects that have elevated |
| 12 |
powers (like QA or devrel), but I think for normal projects our |
| 13 |
current system works well enough. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Ulrich |
Archives