| 1 |
Steve Long kirjoitti: |
| 2 |
>> |
| 3 |
> I don't see how it would wreak more havoc than a novice using, eg ANT from |
| 4 |
> Java which s/he is comfortable with, and then further having to learn BASH |
| 5 |
> peculiarities when things don't fit with the eclass. But yeah, the fun is |
| 6 |
> what attracts me to the idea more than anything. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Java needs to be compiled and ant is meant to be started from the |
| 10 |
command line. Of course you can invoke the main method from Java but |
| 11 |
what's the point? Developers have to be able to review ebuilds and |
| 12 |
having all those different languages would make the job harder and I |
| 13 |
don't really see benefits. If you need something bit more complex done |
| 14 |
in an ebuild, you can always use something like inline python. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
Petteri |
Archives