| 1 |
On 11 July 2012 02:30, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> the last thread started by mgorny has prompted me to ask here on the |
| 5 |
> list which versions of udev we really need in the tree. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
Personally, I'm holding on to 171. I have masked >=181 because of |
| 8 |
bad decisions upstream and I want to see how the situation will |
| 9 |
stabilize. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Since 171 is the latest stable, I would think most of our users are |
| 12 |
on this version anyway. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Since upstream seems to be unwilling to work with us, I think |
| 15 |
we should seriously consider doing a fork. I know there are |
| 16 |
other distros like Debian and Slackware who would be happy |
| 17 |
to join us in that effort. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ben | yngwin |
| 23 |
Gentoo developer |
| 24 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |
Archives