Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 19:36:41
Message-Id: 51213130.7000301@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo by Agostino Sarubbo
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On 02/17/2013 04:03 PM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
5 > In the last time I'm helping some other arches (also arches which I
6 > have no interest) because they appears understaffed.
7 >
8 > Days ago, I tried to make a virtual machine with qemu, for SH since
9 > the dev- machine[1] is a bit slow; well, I discovered we have no
10 > ISO[2] available and there is no handbook[3] for it.
11 >
12 > The same thing is for S390/S390X/M68K/. So how I am able to install
13 > one of that _supported_ arches if there isn't any sort of guide?
14 >
15 > An interesting fact is that we have an handbook for MIPS[4], a
16 > declared unsupported architecture (does not make sense for me).
17 >
18 > Another example is that we have no stable keyword on GCC/glibc for
19 > m68k and I don't know if I need to use another compiler or another
20 > libc.
21 >
22 > Checking on bugzilla I saw no report for some of those arches, so
23 > for me that _partially_ means that probably there are very few
24 > users for those arches on gentoo.
25 >
26 > Now, imho, we have 2 choice:
27 >
28 > 1)Support them with an iso or at least a manual if we can't do an
29 > handbook 2)Lose the stable keyword and don't waste manpower
30 > anymore.
31 >
32 > What do you think about?
33 >
34 > Ref: [1]:
35 > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/dev-machines.xml [2]:
36 > http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/where.xml [3]:
37 > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/#doc_chap2 [4]:
38 > http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-
39 > mips.xml?style=printable&full=1
40 >
41
42 First you need to tell us what arches you think they are considered
43 'minor' and/or understaffed so we can finally document that. Then, in
44 my opinion, the ideal approach would be to just drop the stable
45 keywords for them.
46
47 - --
48 Regards,
49 Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
50 http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
51 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
52 Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
53
54 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRITEwAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCiiQP/2vpx4QuEgJqB3vYpcmmYcwa
55 jLleJnWeat/IsVx3cH28Wy0fLra4MWe8sTGDjtbNBnZZ1z59Fep2Nk/8z3KpoBI0
56 gcKzRinBbqhDjUmoJDQGW16zvTrNWmkAfwkclPTM8v3mJKFl01pODcJUgAk7UrLM
57 NVLyp3OpToF7ZTrJr+lFeHEUB88vcdfnMeV3bM3XZEfifL5cabzUjVibL08utaz2
58 zYL9Rn6UMmzZvYTSrnsOBTOt2uI8ptzp9Ih7mRI5zt8aKrQd5vCYZ/aLXvObF+64
59 ZTjxzMWAC8GbXqQxXAQ/VNKryFyDV8OKj39QsQwoxLNMIV4Pg4Yc1u+fJMqXTu+X
60 nXyvHMM/lcHq6h37E2ua1BjL0tLZGq4kxsGgKuSCzt7gwNAoyCE7eY1V5qFk/uAL
61 U4ATVsY2Q4mKFdu2FlHbn4LfY9D7Rn3OlJhbA2J7108g4BMm70Q++qrxSBAj1xGu
62 VobIkvg5E73Jb3sbcdOS1QOk5cviev4LTh3HjWO6Ozc4HkhdpWk/NlqmQ9SN7J6b
63 hz5sVyV1vPI5/19kfAjBaMotlmLjhq+WgAYRZfeeXJbV/hWXz96eigoxT5n7FbM6
64 aeZKG2Oj8CD0ndH+nf0bg/dACmGJwVnSRBV5iQSuEFO+kLnANRtYEBicjBR92WaJ
65 LiRb4ul/HhURsWeCgIqU
66 =SsrL
67 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo Agostino Sarubbo <ago@g.o>