1 |
Dan Meltzer wrote: |
2 |
> On 1/28/07, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Dan Meltzer wrote: |
4 |
>> > Isn't this kind of against what glep40 set out to do? |
5 |
>> > |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Top posting... |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Any way the thing was that the only change in these ebuilds are the |
10 |
>> eclasses/eclass functions used and the new eclasses have been proven |
11 |
>> stable already. |
12 |
>> |
13 |
>> Regards, |
14 |
>> Petteri |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> |
19 |
> |
20 |
> okay, i'll bottom post this time just for variety. From opfers post |
21 |
> it sounded like he was proposing to allow this for all packages (not |
22 |
> just java). I was enquiring after that. |
23 |
> |
24 |
I have a long email to write about this, but it'll have to wait until |
25 |
tonight or tomorrow. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
======================================================= |
30 |
Mike Doty kingtaco -at- gentoo.org |
31 |
Gentoo/AMD64 Strategic Lead |
32 |
Gentoo Council |
33 |
Gentoo Developer Relations |
34 |
Gentoo Recruitment Lead |
35 |
Gentoo Infrastructure |
36 |
GPG: E1A5 1C9C 93FE F430 C1D6 F2AF 806B A2E4 19F4 AE05 |
37 |
======================================================= |
38 |
-- |
39 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |