| 1 |
Am Freitag, den 09.12.2005, 23:12 +0000 schrieb Donnie Berkholz: |
| 2 |
> 2) Users with no X installed will pull in the virtual/x11 package |
| 3 |
> because there is no longer a default virtual. |
| 4 |
A user in #gentoo-amd64 ran into issues with this that I reproduced in a |
| 5 |
chroot. On a new install, with no X installed you end up with messages |
| 6 |
saying that virtual/x11 is blocking x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
ie, Here's what happens when you attempt to merge aterm: |
| 9 |
http://members.iinet.net.au/~darktama/aterm_merge.log |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I'm not an expert, but the xorg-x11 ebuild has "!virtual/x11" in |
| 12 |
DEPEND/RDEPEND, could this be why? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> I hope that covers pretty much everything right now. |
| 15 |
When porting ebuilds to modular, how do we intend on handling the other |
| 16 |
x11 virtuals in DEPEND/RDEPEND? I'm assuming that we modify it so that |
| 17 |
the modular dependencies depend directly on media-libs/mesa etc, and |
| 18 |
leave virtual/opengl as the alternative? |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Or should I just wait until the real virtual/{opengl,xft,glu,glut} |
| 21 |
ebuilds exist before touching packages that need them? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Thanks for your patience, |
| 25 |
> Donnie |
| 26 |
Thanks for your work on this! |
| 27 |
Ben. |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives