| 1 |
Anupam Kapoor <anupamk@×××××××××.net> writes: |
| 2 |
> ok. got the fix. the problem was that for installing |
| 3 |
> 50xcscope-gentoo.el, we were using a doins instead of using the normal |
| 4 |
> 'elisp-site-file-install'. also we should have used elisp-install for |
| 5 |
> installing the *.el[c] files. the changes fix the problem. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> two questions: |
| 8 |
> 1. how do i send the changes back ? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
No need. I made these changes (and bumped revision) in CVS. The |
| 11 |
changes should be visible via rsync in approximately a half-hour. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> 2. in site-start.el, there seems to be an inconsistency in the way |
| 14 |
> the site files are added to the load-path. for some cases, we have |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
> (setq load-path |
| 17 |
> (cons "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/dircolors" load-path)) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> and for other cases we have |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> (add-to-list 'load-path "/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/htmlize") |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> shouldn't we be doing either of the two ? |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Since these two methods are functionally equivalent, this is not very |
| 26 |
critical. Furthermore, I believe we will be revamping the site file |
| 27 |
management system sometime soon. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Jeremy Maitin-Shepard |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-- |
| 33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives