1 |
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:23 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On 10/12/2015 04:12 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: |
3 |
>> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:47:19 +0200 |
4 |
>> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On 10/12/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: |
7 |
>>>> |
8 |
>>>> Not sure how to read this. The whole idea is for provider / client |
9 |
>>>> to communicate and negotiate a workable solution. At a glance this |
10 |
>>>> reads as the user needs to adapt to the service that the client is |
11 |
>>>> offering and appease the provider. What's wrong with this picture? |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>>> How exactly may I ask does anyone actually offer help to the |
14 |
>>>> Reviewers project whose whole aim it seems is to help all us who |
15 |
>>>> cannot write ebuilds right? |
16 |
>>>> |
17 |
>>> |
18 |
>>> Nowhere did way say that people cannot write ebuilds, nor did we |
19 |
>>> impose that picture. That all happened in your own mind. |
20 |
>>> |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> Yes Julian. Neither did I Julian. I said 'who cannot write ebuilds |
23 |
>> RIGHT'. Please stop taking words out of my mouth and distorting my |
24 |
>> message. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I'm not a native speaker and people have more than once told you that |
28 |
> your language is difficult to understand. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> So, can you elaborate what your sarcastic (that's how I read it) |
31 |
> anecdote was meant for then? Preferably off-list, since this doesn't |
32 |
> seem to help any of us. |
33 |
|
34 |
I am a native speaker and I cannot understand what he's saying, for |
35 |
what it's worth. |
36 |
|
37 |
I think he's indicating that the "right" in his earlier message was |
38 |
indicative of sarcasm, and so then he chides you for responding to his |
39 |
sarcastic message without knowing it was sarcasm. The absurd thing is |
40 |
that he then says "Please stop taking words out of my mouth and |
41 |
distorting my message" (which of course you weren't doing), which was |
42 |
*precisely* what he was doing. |
43 |
|
44 |
In another subthread I really got the sense that he's simply |
45 |
attempting to provoke a response. I suggest not giving him that. |