1 |
>>>>> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016, Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> I would assume 9999 to be high enough, even if you use multiples of |
4 |
>> 100 to label the slot. Or do you expect having more than 100 slots |
5 |
>> for Perl? |
6 |
|
7 |
> Well, the desire is for the -r<x> (or similar) part correspond to |
8 |
> something representative of which version of Perl the virtual is an |
9 |
> "underwriter" for. |
10 |
|
11 |
This would contradict existing policy already, which says that the |
12 |
revision component must not be used for upstream versions: |
13 |
https://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/ebuild-revisions/index.html |
14 |
|
15 |
Ulrich |