1 |
Stephen Bennett napsal(a): |
2 |
> On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:18:26 +0100 |
3 |
> Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Sure I did... Could you tell me why should we accumulate broken and |
6 |
>> vulnerable junk in the tree for years? (Outdated ebuild A depends on |
7 |
>> junky outdated ebuild B which depends on crappy, unsupported ebuilds |
8 |
>> C, D and E which... ) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> To avoid breaking the dep tree for users. Quite simple really. |
11 |
|
12 |
Ah. That's apparently much more important than not breaking users by |
13 |
providing them w/ non-vulnerable, decently uptodate stuff that's not |
14 |
ridden by tons of bugs. Yup. :P |
15 |
|
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Best regards, |
19 |
|
20 |
Jakub Moc |
21 |
mailto:jakub@g.o |
22 |
GPG signature: |
23 |
http://subkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xCEBA3D9E |
24 |
Primary key fingerprint: D2D7 933C 9BA1 C95B 2C95 B30F 8717 D5FD CEBA 3D9E |
25 |
|
26 |
... still no signature ;) |