| 1 |
On Thu, Apr 14, 2005 at 06:06:18PM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: |
| 2 |
> maillog: 14/04/2005-11:01:19(+0200): Andrea Barisani types |
| 3 |
> > I'm prefectly happy with removing our reply-to header (and leaving |
| 4 |
> > user_defined one if any) if the userbase of this ml is happy to deal without |
| 5 |
> > it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Are you gonna start a poll on the forums? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Starting a poll on *forums* about a *ml*, no thanks :). Hope you were being |
| 11 |
sarcastic. I'm open to suggestions other than the "remove the header and let the |
| 12 |
flames come" option which unfortunately looks like the only one to me and |
| 13 |
despite being "right" in many regards I fear it will cause the havoc that |
| 14 |
we've experienced on gentoo-user. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o> .*. |
| 18 |
Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V |
| 19 |
( ) |
| 20 |
GPG-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) |
| 21 |
0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E ^^_^^ |
| 22 |
"Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives