| 1 |
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:08:52 +0100 |
| 2 |
Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@×××××××××××.fr> wrote: |
| 3 |
> There's no need to introduce a potential infinity of new files |
| 4 |
> extensions for that. A single one is enough: just call files which |
| 5 |
> use the rule i've proposed "foo.gbuild" instead of "foo.ebuild", and |
| 6 |
> you're done. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
You're done until someone wants to introduce a change large enough that |
| 9 |
it breaks the dodgy pattern matching package managers are doing to get |
| 10 |
the EAPI currently. Which isn't that unlikely -- consider the original |
| 11 |
purpose for metadata.xml for an example. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives