| 1 |
On Sun, 2022-08-21 at 15:10 -0400, matoro wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey mjo, sorry about this - we were somewhat aggressive when building |
| 3 |
> this list because much of the ecosystem has a tendency to do things like |
| 4 |
> put strict upper bounds in their cabal files, leading to lots of |
| 5 |
> blockers and manual patching whenever dependencies get bumped. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Do any of your packages pull in deps that are in the last-rited list? |
| 8 |
> If not I don't see an issue with keeping them. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
These are the recently-masked first-level dependencies that they need, |
| 12 |
but there may be more transitively: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
dev-haskell/configurator |
| 15 |
dev-haskell/dns |
| 16 |
dev-haskell/filemanip |
| 17 |
dev-haskell/hdbc |
| 18 |
dev-haskell/hdbc-postgresql |
| 19 |
dev-haskell/hdbc-sqlite3 |
| 20 |
dev-haskell/missingh |
| 21 |
dev-haskell/parallel-io |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
All of the bounds in my four packages are >= bounds -- even in the |
| 24 |
cabal file -- to avoid the problem you mentioned. I'd guess that they |
| 25 |
build fine against whatever the latest versions of those dependencies |
| 26 |
are; if not, the dependencies could be updated (can't hurt worse than |
| 27 |
masking, right?) |
Archives