Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mark Bateman <couldbe@××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 14:10:39
Message-Id: loom.20120903T160611-184@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots by Patrick Lauer
1 Patrick Lauer <patrick <at> gentoo.org> writes:
2
3 >
4 > On 06/23/12 21:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 > > There's been a move towards using slots for "clever" things that don't
6 > > fit the traditional way of how slots worked. Examples include the new
7 > > gtk2 / gtk3 handling and Ruby gems virtuals.
8 > >
9 > > Aside from being abusive,
10 > No, it solves a real problem.
11 > > this screws things up for Paludis users.
12 > -EDONTCARE, use a supported package manager
13
14
15
16 So if the packagemanager is struggling to resolve whether a package belongs in a
17 slot or not, would this be a case for encoding such metadata in the ebuild
18 filename.
19
20 foo-slot2-3.2.1.ebuild
21
22 This way the PM would be able to determine exactly what it has todo before it
23 starts to parse the ebuild

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>