| 1 |
On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 15:21:16 +0200 |
| 2 |
Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 08:13:14 -0400 |
| 5 |
> Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > If you just check your packages occassionally to make sure they build |
| 8 |
> > with gold it completely achieves the goal, and it will actually result |
| 9 |
> > in fewer bugs using the non-gold linker as well. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> That's what a tinderbox is for. The only QA problem I see here is that |
| 12 |
> QA doesn't automate that kind of checks anymore since Diego left. Maybe |
| 13 |
> QA should ask Toralf to run a ld.gold tinderbox and avoid asking people |
| 14 |
> to randomly test random packages ? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Yes, tinderboxing makes a lot of sense if the bugs are afterwards |
| 17 |
ignored by package maintainers. Or in the best case, the maintainer |
| 18 |
tells reporter (Toralf) to file the bug upstream. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
| 23 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives