| 1 |
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 11:52:46 AM JST, NP-Hardass wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 07/05/2016 10:43 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 9:00:12 AM JST, Anthony G. Basile wrote: ... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> I think it is a little bit of a stretch to say that he's the only one to |
| 6 |
> have an issue. Now, I've spoken with the parties involved, so my issue |
| 7 |
> is resolved, but I had a package of mine bumped in the name of security |
| 8 |
> without being pinged/consulted at all. I'm not attempting to point |
| 9 |
> blame at anyone, but merely show that there are others who have been |
| 10 |
> affected by security workflow sometimes going around the maintainer. I |
| 11 |
> don't think there should be any harm in acknowledging that, and striving |
| 12 |
> to make sure it doesn't happen in the future, where possible. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
As discussed, that issue was not a security bug nor handled by the security |
| 16 |
team. So it is irrelevant. |
Archives