| 1 |
On 10/31/2012 10:05 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 9:18 AM, <lists@×××××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Maybe you should remember that non-devs simply /aren't allowed/ to |
| 4 |
>> assign bugs correctly... |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> And if you look closer into these bugs, you might discover that jer |
| 7 |
>> instructed this guy to file separate bugs. (see #440178) |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Fair points, and clearly this wasn't malicious. I think we still want |
| 11 |
> to find a better solution than logging dozens of bugs for the |
| 12 |
> wranglers. Perhaps where there is a need we can give elevated privs |
| 13 |
> in bugzilla to those running scripts who understand what they're |
| 14 |
> doing. Or non-devs could ask a dev to run the script for them after |
| 15 |
> review. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
This would be nice anyway. I'm generally capable of reading metadata.xml |
| 18 |
and determining whether or not to tag my bugs with e.g. STABLEREQ. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
One less bug to wrangle. |
Archives