| 1 |
On Sat, 2004-04-03 at 01:44, Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 2 |
> Someone posted an article[1] about optimizing distcc a few days ago on -user. It talked |
| 3 |
> about using unsermake[2] instead of automake to generate Makefiles that let many source |
| 4 |
> files be built at once, which allows you to take full advantage of a network full of |
| 5 |
> distcc hosts. Did any of the devs take a look at it? It appears to only be available |
| 6 |
> through KDE CVS, but that's never stopped any of you before :) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Once unsermake is a standalone and comparable to automake (that is, it |
| 9 |
must do everything automake does) I don't see any reason not to prefer |
| 10 |
it over automake. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
However, as it stands now unsermake still doesn't support all of |
| 13 |
automake's features. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
-- |
| 16 |
Regards, |
| 17 |
-Lisa |
| 18 |
<Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur> |
Archives