Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Matthew Marlowe <matt@××××××××××××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: old udev versions
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 02:49:27
Message-Id: CAAJQwcAx15OB-kCx23WuPCX7rzvNZ6V5VJtT1WMJPM=gTOV1gA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] rfc: old udev versions by William Hubbs
1 > I've looked at the kernel packages we have in /usr/portage, but have no
2 > guide there either. If I go by gentoo-sources, I could get rid of all
3 > but very recent versions of udev, but I have heard some things also
4 > about people using older kernels. Also, vanilla-sources goes all the way
5 > back to 2.6.16 (I have no idea why)?
6 >
7
8 I think, at the very least, we want to support kernel 2.6.32 or later
9 via whatever methods are required in Gentoo to allow those existing
10 systems to keep running and recompile as needed. 2.6.32 is used by a
11 number of mainstream distributions as a long term stable release.
12 And, cautious admins migrating to Gentoo or supporting the same apps
13 on multiple distributions may want to continue to stick with that
14 kernel release for awhile. I'm also aware that 2.6.36 was widely
15 deployed for gentoo servers around here, although some of those
16 systems have started to migrate to 3.2. I'm not sure how much of a
17 need there would be for anything older than 2.6.32. 2.6.32 would seem
18 to be a reasonable cutoff.
19
20 As for udev specifically, 171 is what is deployed on most boxes here
21 to avoid any possible need for an initrd or other possible bugs with
22 newer releases... Reading the udev-171 ebuild, it appears it supports
23 >2.6.16 so I'm not sure if there is any need for udev versions earlier
24 than 171.