Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 10:26:30
Message-Id: f46be57135c25b21ab95368a09d9e5ceedbb5297.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation by "Toralf Förster"
1 On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 12:15 +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
2 > On 4/26/20 10:52 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
3 > > Do you have any other idea for spam protection then?
4 >
5 > IMO there're 2 types of spam:
6 >
7 > 1. made by accident (eg. "* * * * *" instead "@weekly" in crontab)
8 > 2. made intentionlly
9 >
10 > The 1st can be handled by UUID - just drop any old related dataset from inbox when a new one arrived
11 > For the 2nd: what about accepting only datasets from "valid" UUIDs, meaning where just 1 dataset/week/IPv4 (maybe /16 block) in the mean did arrived in the last few weeks/months ?
12 >
13
14 I'm sorry but could you rephrase that in more sentences? I don't
15 understand what you mean.
16
17 --
18 Best regards,
19 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for gentoostats implementation "Toralf Förster" <toralf@g.o>