| 1 |
Are you considering to replace the mediawiki with a different wiki system such |
| 2 |
as moinmoin? |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 7:49:58 am Michael Hammer wrote: |
| 5 |
> * Gokdeniz Karadag <gokdeniz@×××××××××××××.tr> [081112 13:06]: |
| 6 |
> > Petteri Räty demis ki:: |
| 7 |
> > > Michael Hammer wrote: |
| 8 |
> > > We should develop some kind of review process and at least the |
| 9 |
> > > possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases |
| 10 |
> > > the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed |
| 11 |
> > > section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the |
| 12 |
> > > infos provided have a minimum of quality. |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> You're fully right! The GDP can therefore be the reviewed sections |
| 17 |
> where documents from the wiki are transfered to. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> > The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which |
| 20 |
> > can become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by |
| 21 |
> > developers. |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> That's the way I intended my proposal. As some kind of early state GDP |
| 24 |
> documents. It's an unwritten fact that user are willing to contribute |
| 25 |
> to wiki systems - but I've never received an xml file for our GDP |
| 26 |
> written by a user ;) ... The wiki can be the place to develop new |
| 27 |
> howtos by disburding the devs - IMHO. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> g, mueli |
Archives