Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Bill Anderson <bill@×××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tom
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 09:00:41
Message-Id: 3A704D65.9070102@noreboots.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tom by 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)
1 Achim Gottinger wrote:
2
3 > Thomas Flavel wrote:
4 >
5 >
6 >> On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 07:29:01PM -0600, Bryce Porter wrote:
7 >>
8 >>> Tom:
9 >>> "I'm just thinking along the lines of a minimum binary system where
10 >>> absolutley needed, and compiling specifically everywhere else? I realise this would
11 >>> be slow to install on slower systems, but, since we're all power users... ;)
12 >>>
13 >>> Seriously though, I do think this would be a nice feature, unless there's
14 >>> some practicality reason I'm missing."
15 >>> -------------------------------------------------------------
16 >>>
17 >>> I think this is a great idea. I heard of a GNU/Linux distrobution that
18 >>> when installed compiled all selected packages from source, making it the
19 >>> most optimized you could get for your specific machine. I think it was
20 >>> called Rock Linux or something.
21 >>
22 >> Not heard of it, but a quick search on google reveals the predicatable url:
23 >> http://www.rocklinux.org, #rocklinux on irc.openprojects.net.
24 >>
25 >> Looks to be faily mature (at least they're past 1.0 ;), supports ppc and alpha
26 >> as well as x86.
27 >
28 >
29 > Please send me you ppc, alpha, i64, mips, sparc machines and I will do the ports. :-)
30 >
31
32
33 How about SSH access to an Alpha? Good enough? ;^)=
34
35 >
36 >> From what I can see it has a binary cd version, with the option
37 >> to compile from source (the same thing I was talking about, if I understand them
38 >> correctly). It describes it's package management as closer to FreeBSD than debian.
39 >> It looks to be quite similar to gentoo to me, although not quite as advanced.
40 >
41 >
42 > I took a look at the site and think that we need something similar to cfengine
43 > sometimes.
44 >
45 > I thougth about a minimum build system too, while I had to go back to i486 from i686.
46 > There is another project linux-from-scratch (www.lfs.org i think) that creates a
47 > statically linked set
48 > of packages required for build first and then builds the rest with that bin's. Such a
49 > set would require
50 > about 50MB and it is not difficult to make a few modified packages for that.
51 > This build-system could be placed on a gentoo-source cd together with a snapshot of the
52 > port-tree.
53 > Then you whould be able to boot with the source-cd and install a build.tbz2 instead of a
54 > sys.tbz2.
55 > Then you can chroot to that system and build everything from sources.
56 > Additionally this offers the possibility to build gentoo from within another
57 > linux-distro.
58 >
59 > How do you guys think about that?
60
61 Sounds rather cool to me.
62
63
64 Bill

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tom Bill Anderson <bill@×××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tom 320095285153-0001@t-online.de (Achim Gottinger)