Archives
Archives
| From: | Michael Orlitzky <mjo@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] dev-vcs/hub: migrate to go-module.eclass | ||
| Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2019 12:11:54 | ||
| Message-Id: | 715ec831-7a16-2994-fa52-10c6cd8f1f8a@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] dev-vcs/hub: migrate to go-module.eclass by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | On 9/12/19 11:13 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I'm really objecting to your suggestion that we abuse an existing |
| 4 | > Portage/PMS feature to do something beyond its design. Adding |
| 5 | > fictitious runtime dependencies is wrong, and seems like a very lazy |
| 6 | > solution. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Ok, you're right. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | > If you want to propose an extension to PMS to handle this situation, |
| 12 | > that's something I can support. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Portage and the PMS are fine. This junk belongs in an overlay. |