| 1 |
2009-11-06 23:07:58 Zac Medico napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On 06-11-2009 19:48:16 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 1:42 AM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> >>> In the past when smaller arches were not that active we used to mark |
| 6 |
> >>> Java packages stable after testing by at least one arch team. The |
| 7 |
> >>> probability to find arch specific issues in something like Java is not |
| 8 |
> >>> so high so I think arrangements like this are acceptable when the arch |
| 9 |
> >>> teams have problems keeping up. |
| 10 |
> >> I think the same should be extended to other languages such as Perl |
| 11 |
> >> and Python (unless they have portions which are C/C++) |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > Sounds like we could benefit from the "noarch" approach known in the RPM |
| 14 |
> > world, such that all these packages can also be immediately keyworded |
| 15 |
> > and stabilised for all arches. Would greatly simplify things for a |
| 16 |
> > great deal of packages, maybe? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> We could introduce "noarch" and "~noarch" KEYWORDS, add "noarch" to |
| 19 |
> the default ACCEPT_KEYWORDS setting for all profiles, and instruct |
| 20 |
> unstable users to add "~noarch" to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
It seems to be a good idea, but I would prefer to use words "universal" |
| 23 |
and "~universal" :) . |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis |
Archives