1 |
Offering a choice was always a very important thing in Gentoo. |
2 |
Forcing the user into freesoftware will only make them switch. |
3 |
The people who like that zealotery already use Debian anyway. |
4 |
|
5 |
The choice is the most important thing for me. |
6 |
|
7 |
Personaly i hate closed source stuff installed on my machine. |
8 |
I dislike Nvidias binary only drivers and would never buy |
9 |
hardware which requires me to use proprietary software. |
10 |
|
11 |
That's my personal choice and not a reason to suggest ripping |
12 |
out Nvidia drivers from Gentoo. The user should have the choice |
13 |
to use it or not. |
14 |
|
15 |
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 01:06:05AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
16 |
> Sven Vermeulen <swift@g.o> writes: |
17 |
> |
18 |
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 09:16:19AM -0600, Matthew Kennedy wrote: |
19 |
> >> Personally, I am only interested in supporting and using free |
20 |
> >> software, so... |
21 |
> >> |
22 |
> >> The best solution is just to remove support for anything non-free in |
23 |
> >> portage and to also remove any non-free software from our mirrors. |
24 |
> >> Let some other external project step up to the plate and provide a |
25 |
> >> non-free overlay if they wish. |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > I disagree. Give the users who want the chance to not use "non-free" |
28 |
> > software, but also give the others the chance to use non-free software. |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > I think you'll get a lot of gamers against you when you tell them you don't |
31 |
> > want them to easily install their favorite non-free game :) |
32 |
> |
33 |
> [...] |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Jon, Sven, |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Obviously, its more important that the "gamers" are not upset by a |
38 |
> single line change in make.conf. The principle of building a Free |
39 |
> software distribution has got to be less important than that. |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Seriously though, it is my impression that you may be surprised how |
42 |
> many folks care that their box uses free software only. You might |
43 |
> want to check the Debian news out of late. There's a proposal to do |
44 |
> away with(?) non-free in their distro (ie. clause 5. in their social |
45 |
> contract would be removed). |
46 |
> |
47 |
> I suppose I am dismayed that we are failing to promote free software |
48 |
> over proprietary software. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> Matt |
51 |
> -- |
52 |
> Matthew Kennedy |
53 |
> Gentoo Linux Developer |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |