| 1 |
On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 10:00 +0200, Corentin Chary wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Hans de Graaff <graaff@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > One integration that might also be useful is what we track on the ruby |
| 5 |
> > wiki currently: https://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/ruby/wiki/PendingBumps |
| 6 |
> > which is a collection of quick notes on problems encountered while |
| 7 |
> > bumping packages. The ability to attach notes to packages and to |
| 8 |
> > acknowledge version bumps (and e.g. make them yellow instead of red) |
| 9 |
> > could help with larger lists for herds. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> You can already use that page: http://euscan.iksaif.net/herds/ruby/ |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I think you missed my point. This page is more like what we have at |
| 14 |
http://moving-innovations.com/~graaff/outdated-gems/ which is an |
| 15 |
automated list based on what is in the tree and upstream. Your page is a |
| 16 |
good replacement for that so we may just use that in the future. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
What our wiki page does it keep *notes* on these bumps, so all of that |
| 19 |
relies on manual input. (e.g. "we tried to bump this but it needs a new |
| 20 |
dependency that we don't have yet.") The euscan page doesn't support |
| 21 |
that yet. Arguably I should open bugs for each of these bumps, but that |
| 22 |
seems like a lot of overhead for some quick notes. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Kind regards, |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Hans |
Archives