Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steve Dibb <beandog@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 00:44:19
Message-Id: 4C3E59C9.7030203@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio by Paul Arthur
On 07/14/2010 05:27 PM, Paul Arthur wrote:
> On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs<williamh@g.o> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs >>> <williamh@g.o> wrote: =20 >>> >>>> All, =20 I have recently noticed that our amateur radio >>>> applications are in the category media-radio. =20 Amateur Radio >>>> is not considered part of the media, so I would like to propose >>>> renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the >>>> amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in >>>> media-radio which are not amateur radio related. =20 >>> >>> I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore >>> I am a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in >>> media-radio. If we do the move please count on me. >> >> I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the >> ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part >> of the media. > > But it is a medium. media-* has nothing to do with "the media"; I > really don't see any point to this proposed change.. >
I say go for it. media-radio should be for V4L2 apps, mostly, that use it. The remaining two can either go into media-tv or app-misc or some other fitting category. Steve

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: amateur radio applications should not be in media-radio Chip Parker <infowolfe@×××××.com>