1 |
On 07/14/2010 05:27 PM, Paul Arthur wrote: |
2 |
> On 2010-07-14, William Hubbs<williamh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:48:25PM +0200, Thomas Beierlein wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:27:47 -0500 William Hubbs |
7 |
>>> <williamh@g.o> wrote: =20 |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>>> All, =20 I have recently noticed that our amateur radio |
10 |
>>>> applications are in the category media-radio. =20 Amateur Radio |
11 |
>>>> is not considered part of the media, so I would like to propose |
12 |
>>>> renaming this category to app-hamradio, or possibly moving the |
13 |
>>>> amateur radio applications to app-hamradio if there are things in |
14 |
>>>> media-radio which are not amateur radio related. =20 |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> I like the idea very much. But I am an radio amateur and therefore |
17 |
>>> I am a little bit biased :). I was always confused to find them in |
18 |
>>> media-radio. If we do the move please count on me. |
19 |
>> |
20 |
>> I am an amateur radio operator as well, and that is why putting the |
21 |
>> ham radio apps in"media-radio" bothers me. Ham radio is not part |
22 |
>> of the media. |
23 |
> |
24 |
> But it is a medium. media-* has nothing to do with "the media"; I |
25 |
> really don't see any point to this proposed change.. |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I say go for it. media-radio should be for V4L2 apps, mostly, that use |
29 |
it. The remaining two can either go into media-tv or app-misc or some |
30 |
other fitting category. |
31 |
|
32 |
Steve |