1 |
On Sunday 23 November 2003 10:59, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 23 November 2003 07:43, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > On Saturday 22 November 2003 11:56, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
4 |
> > > xfree contains LICENSE="X11 MSttfEULA" |
5 |
> > > qt contains LICENSE="QPL-1.0 | GPL-2" |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > What other lexical forms are there? The ebuild howto doesn't even |
8 |
> > > mention the above construct. Will I find something like "(LIC1 LIC2) | |
9 |
> > > LIC3"? |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > there has been no real position on how to declare multiple licenses ... |
12 |
> > thus devs have just done whatever ... |
13 |
> > some may say | means one thing, some may say it means another, the truth |
14 |
> > is, it has never officially been declared thus it really means nothing |
15 |
> > when looking at the portage tree as a whole |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Created new bug #34146 |
18 |
|
19 |
As a side note, I found a couple of ebuilds that are a bit of a concern. |
20 |
|
21 |
app-emulation/point2play |
22 |
LICENSE="Aladdin" # not sure about that .. comments? |
23 |
|
24 |
dev-python/python-ldap |
25 |
dev-python/python-ldap-py21 |
26 |
LICENSE="public-domain" #NOTE: win32 section is under questionable license |
27 |
|
28 |
Created a bug for these too. #34147 |
29 |
|
30 |
Jason |
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |