| 1 |
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 12:32:57 -0700 |
| 2 |
Diego Elio Pettenò <flameeyes@×××××××××.eu> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 30/10/2012 12:24, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> > How are you going to solve the issue of a lot of packages being broken |
| 6 |
> > with new boost versions? Are you volunteering to keep fixing them with |
| 7 |
> > each release? |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> How are you going to solve the problem that the packages that are not |
| 10 |
> fixed to work with a new boost are not going to work anyway because |
| 11 |
> boost.m4 will still get the latest one, and most of the old ones |
| 12 |
> wouldn't work anyway because they are not compatible with the compiler/C |
| 13 |
> library/whatever? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
By inheriting boost-utils and using the correct function to use older |
| 16 |
boost slot? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Best regards, |
| 20 |
Michał Górny |
Archives