1 |
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:47:03PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
2 |
> Sweet, we actually got an invitation to bikeshed! Here's my contributions: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> gentoo-tree.git |
5 |
> gentoo-portage-tree.git |
6 |
> portage-tree.git |
7 |
> (the name 'portage' derives from bsd ports, so it makes sense to keep |
8 |
> that connection to make it recognizable to that audience) |
9 |
Please note that I said _location_. |
10 |
I'm not so happy about putting them in in the toplevel namespace. |
11 |
You need to provide TWO names: |
12 |
1. The current tree that we will start with. |
13 |
2. The read-only graftable tree with full history (going back to the |
14 |
start of Gentoo commits). |
15 |
|
16 |
As much as I like the original "Portage tree", I do agree it's lead to |
17 |
confusing of the source code of the package manager vs. the ebuild tree. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
21 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
22 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
23 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |