| 1 |
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:44:22 +0200 |
| 2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running |
| 5 |
> eautoreconf? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> so instead of |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> src_unpack() { |
| 10 |
> unpack ${A} |
| 11 |
> cd "${A}" |
| 12 |
> eautoreconf |
| 13 |
> } |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> would just add |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> EAUTORECONF="yes" |
| 18 |
> inherit base |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Regards, |
| 21 |
> Petteri |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
And if you can't run eautoreconf but instead one of specific commands, |
| 25 |
eautoconf, eautomake.. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Or what if you need to run AT_M4DIR="/path/to/macros" eautoreconf? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Or when you are about to remove eautoreconf, spot that fbsd is |
| 30 |
keyworded and need to substitute it with elibtoolize to avoid |
| 31 |
.so version breakage wouldn't it be easier to convert from what |
| 32 |
we use now? |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
What about WANT_ variables? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
-drac |
| 37 |
-- |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives