| 1 |
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:44:48 -0400 |
| 2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <blueness@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> I would prefer the bugs be assigned to hardened-kernel@g.o and |
| 5 |
> cc'ed to hardened@g.o. All relevant devs should be on one or |
| 6 |
> the other list. However, I am currently the principle maintainer of |
| 7 |
> h-s. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
You really don't expect the currently 5-10 regular bug wranglers to |
| 10 |
remember all that, do you? If you want things listed in a specific |
| 11 |
order, then just remember the rules: |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
= Alternative A = |
| 14 |
* first maintainer from the top down gets to be assignee, |
| 15 |
* otherwise the first herd gets to be assignee. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Put them in the right order an you should have no problem with bug |
| 18 |
assignments. We could discuss this processing order (maybe change it |
| 19 |
to having |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
= Alternative B = |
| 22 |
* the top herd or maintainer as assignee |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
(but I really don't want to get tangled up in a discussion about your |
| 25 |
preferences or anyone's preferences, and how bug wranglers should |
| 26 |
reflect those). |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
jer |
Archives