| 1 |
On 08/15/2013 02:52 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:13:07 +0200 |
| 3 |
> hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> I have no idea what that means. Global changes are _always_ discussed |
| 6 |
>> in the community. PMS doesn't add anything to that process. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> It puts the consensus and / or decisions in one canonical categorized |
| 9 |
> resource, such that you don't have to search ages in archives to |
| 10 |
> gather all the pieces together; where would they otherwise be placed? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> PMS avoids us from having to manually solve an unnecessary puzzle. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That sounds interesting in theory, in practice it's the other way |
| 17 |
around. We solve puzzles to avoid PMS or reverse-fix it. |
Archives